Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8660785
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Munoz v. Mukasey
No. 8660785 · Decided March 27, 2008
No. 8660785·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 27, 2008
Citation
No. 8660785
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Antonio Leon Munoz petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioner’s challenge to the IJ’s extreme hardship determination because it is a nonreviewable discretionary determination. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)). Petitioner’s contentions that the agency violated his due process and equal protection rights by failing to consider properly the proffered evidence do not amount to colorable constitutional claims. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Antonio Leon Munoz petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jose Antonio Leon Munoz petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
02We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioner’s challenge to the IJ’s extreme hardship determination because it is a nonreviewable discretionary determination.
03Petitioner’s contentions that the agency violated his due process and equal protection rights by failing to consider properly the proffered evidence do not amount to colorable constitutional claims.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Antonio Leon Munoz petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Munoz v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 27, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8660785 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.