FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621639
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Munn v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc.

No. 8621639 · Decided May 11, 2006
No. 8621639 · Ninth Circuit · 2006 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 11, 2006
Citation
No. 8621639
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * Bruce Munn appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. He claimed that the company wrongfully terminated him in violation of California Government Code § 12653 and Labor Code § 1102.5. In this appeal, he claims that he is entitled to protection under § 12653(b), which bars retaliation against employees who disclose information to a government or law enforcement agency to further a false claims action under § 12652. In discussing the account of the Sheriffs Department, the plaintiff unwittingly provided information that the Department recognized as being double billing. The plaintiff never knowingly furnished any information about false claims. For the reasons given by the district court, the plaintiff is not entitled to the protections of the whistleblower statute. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM * Bruce Munn appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Aramark Correctional Services, Inc.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM * Bruce Munn appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Aramark Correctional Services, Inc.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Munn v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 11, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8621639 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →