FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627017
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Mujica v. Gonzales

No. 8627017 · Decided December 13, 2006
No. 8627017 · Ninth Circuit · 2006 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 13, 2006
Citation
No. 8627017
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Camerino Valenzuela Mujica, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order denying as untimely his motion to reconsider its decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings to apply for relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Valenzuela-Mujica’s motion to reconsider as untimely because it was filed more than three months out of time. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2) (a motion to reconsider a decision of the BIA must be filed within 30 days after the date of that decision). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Camerino Valenzuela Mujica, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order denying as untimely his motion to reconsider its decision denying his motion to re
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Camerino Valenzuela Mujica, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order denying as untimely his motion to reconsider its decision denying his motion to re
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Mujica v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 13, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627017 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →