Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8697004
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Muñoz v. Social Security Administration
No. 8697004 · Decided June 6, 2016
No. 8697004·Ninth Circuit · 2016·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 6, 2016
Citation
No. 8697004
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Gilberto G. Muñoz appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his action under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., alleging retaliatory firing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo a district court’s ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment. Ford v. City of Yakima, 706 F.3d 1188, 1192 (9th Cir.2013). We affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants because Muñoz failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants’ legitimate reason for firing him was pre-textual. See Coons v. Sec’y of U.S. Dep’t of Treasury, 383 F.3d 879, 887-88 (9th Cir. 2004) (setting forth burden shifting test for evaluating a retaliation claim under the Rehabilitation Act). Muñoz’s requests for judicial notice, set forth in his reply brief, are denied as unnecessary. *634 We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983 , 985 n. 2 (9th Cir.2009). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Muñoz appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his action under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.
Key Points
01Muñoz appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his action under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.
02We review de novo a district court’s ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment.
03The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants because Muñoz failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants’ legitimate reason for firing him was pre-textual.
042004) (setting forth burden shifting test for evaluating a retaliation claim under the Rehabilitation Act).
Frequently Asked Questions
Muñoz appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his action under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Muñoz v. Social Security Administration in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 6, 2016.
Use the citation No. 8697004 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.