Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8645607
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Mozo-Genel v. Mukasey
No. 8645607 · Decided November 26, 2007
No. 8645607·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 26, 2007
Citation
No. 8645607
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Mozo-Genel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioner’s challenge to the IJ’s extreme hardship determination because it is a nonreviewable discretionary determination. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)). Petitioner’s contention that the agency violated his due process rights by failing to properly evaluate the evidence of hardship does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Mozo-Genel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Mozo-Genel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
02We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioner’s challenge to the IJ’s extreme hardship determination because it is a nonreviewable discretionary determination.
03Petitioner’s contention that the agency violated his due process rights by failing to properly evaluate the evidence of hardship does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Mozo-Genel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Mozo-Genel v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 26, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8645607 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.