FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8699703
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

No. 8699703 · Decided January 5, 2017
No. 8699703 · Ninth Circuit · 2017 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 5, 2017
Citation
No. 8699703
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER The members of the panel that decided this case voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Paez voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Nelson and Judge Bucklo recommended denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. (Fed.R. App. P. 35.) The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied.
Plain English Summary
ORDER The members of the panel that decided this case voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER The members of the panel that decided this case voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 5, 2017.
Use the citation No. 8699703 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →