Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642467
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Moreno v. Gonzales
No. 8642467 · Decided August 22, 2007
No. 8642467·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 22, 2007
Citation
No. 8642467
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Bernardo Pichardo Moreno and Maria Edna Sanchez de Pichardo, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) streamlined order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their motion to administratively close their deportation proceedings for repapering. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing de novo, Alcaraz v. INS, 384 F.3d 1150, 1158 (9th Cir.2004), we deny petition for review. The IJ did not err in denying petitioners’ motion to close proceedings because petitioners failed to establish they were physically present for a continuous period of seven years prior to applying for suspension of deportation, and thus were ineligible for repapering. See id. at 1153-55 *635 (laying out the criteria necessary for repapering). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Bernardo Pichardo Moreno and Maria Edna Sanchez de Pichardo, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) streamlined order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Bernardo Pichardo Moreno and Maria Edna Sanchez de Pichardo, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) streamlined order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’
02INS, 384 F.3d 1150, 1158 (9th Cir.2004), we deny petition for review.
03The IJ did not err in denying petitioners’ motion to close proceedings because petitioners failed to establish they were physically present for a continuous period of seven years prior to applying for suspension of deportation, and thus wer
04at 1153-55 *635 (laying out the criteria necessary for repapering).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Bernardo Pichardo Moreno and Maria Edna Sanchez de Pichardo, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) streamlined order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Moreno v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 22, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642467 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.