Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8660777
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Morales v. Mukasey
No. 8660777 · Decided March 27, 2008
No. 8660777·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 27, 2008
Citation
No. 8660777
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** David Ledezma Morales, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for re *562 view of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision summarily affirming the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioner’s challenge to the IJ’s extreme hardship determination because it is a nonreviewable discretionary determination. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)). Petitioner’s conclusory allegation that his deportation proceedings constituted a due process violation does not constitute a colorable constitutional claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** David Ledezma Morales, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for re *562 view of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision summarily affirming the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellat
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** David Ledezma Morales, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for re *562 view of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision summarily affirming the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellat
02We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioner’s challenge to the IJ’s extreme hardship determination because it is a nonreviewable discretionary determination.
03Petitioner’s conclusory allegation that his deportation proceedings constituted a due process violation does not constitute a colorable constitutional claim.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** David Ledezma Morales, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for re *562 view of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision summarily affirming the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellat
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Morales v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 27, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8660777 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.