Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8625831
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Morales-Jimenez v. Gonzales
No. 8625831 · Decided November 15, 2006
No. 8625831·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 15, 2006
Citation
No. 8625831
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Adela Morales-Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings. See Sanchez-Cruz v. INS, 255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition for review. Morales-Jimenez’s contention that the IJ violated her due process rights by denying her application for cancellation of removal while her son’s application was pending is unavailing because she has not shown prejudice. See id. Further, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Morales-Jimenez is ineligible for cancellation of removal because she lacks a qualifying relative. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Adela Morales-Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying her application for
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Adela Morales-Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying her application for
02We review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings.
03Morales-Jimenez’s contention that the IJ violated her due process rights by denying her application for cancellation of removal while her son’s application was pending is unavailing because she has not shown prejudice.
04Further, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Morales-Jimenez is ineligible for cancellation of removal because she lacks a qualifying relative.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Adela Morales-Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying her application for
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Morales-Jimenez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 15, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8625831 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.