FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8645292
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Mojica v. Mukasey

No. 8645292 · Decided November 19, 2007
No. 8645292 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 19, 2007
Citation
No. 8645292
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status. This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioners’ motion for reconsideration. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ fifth motion to reconsider as numerically barred. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229a(b)(6)(A) (“[t]he alien may file one motion to reconsider a decision ... ”), 1003.2(b)(2) (“[a] party may file only one motion to reconsider any given decision and may not seek reconsideration of a decision denying a previous motion to reconsider”). Accordingly, respondent’s opposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Mojica v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 19, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8645292 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →