Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8628870
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Mohiuddin v. Raytheon Co.
No. 8628870 · Decided February 26, 2007
No. 8628870·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 26, 2007
Citation
No. 8628870
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the responses to the court’s December 21, 2006 order indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint because the failure to file timely the amended complaint was not excusable neglect. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b)(2); Kyle v. Campbell Soup Co., 28 F.3d 928, 930 (9th Cir.1994) (district court Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) ruling is reviewed for abuse of discretion). The motion for judicial notice is denied. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the responses to the court’s December 21, 2006 order indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the responses to the court’s December 21, 2006 order indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
03The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint because the failure to file timely the amended complaint was not excusable neglect.
04Campbell Soup Co., 28 F.3d 928, 930 (9th Cir.1994) (district court Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) ruling is reviewed for abuse of discretion).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the responses to the court’s December 21, 2006 order indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Mohiuddin v. Raytheon Co. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 26, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8628870 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.