Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8629660
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Miranda-Navarrete v. Gonzales
No. 8629660 · Decided March 16, 2007
No. 8629660·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 16, 2007
Citation
No. 8629660
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Martin Miranda-Navarrete seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that MirandaNavarrete failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his father, see Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003), and Miranda-Navarrete does not raise a colorable due process claim, see Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Martin Miranda-Navarrete seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Martin Miranda-Navarrete seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal.
02We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that MirandaNavarrete failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his father, see Romero-Torres v.
03Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003), and Miranda-Navarrete does not raise a colorable due process claim, see Martinez-Rosas v.
04Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Martin Miranda-Navarrete seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Miranda-Navarrete v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 16, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8629660 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.