Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8788345
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Miner v. Rickey
No. 8788345 · Decided September 7, 1909
No. 8788345·Ninth Circuit · 1909·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 7, 1909
Citation
No. 8788345
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM. This action was brought by the plaintiff in error in the court below against the defendants in error to recover certain money claimed to be due by reason of his alleged employment by the defendants as their attorney in certain litigation. The case was tried before the court without a jury by agreement of the parties, and resulted in findings to the effect that 1he plaintiff was never employed by the defendants in the litigation referred to, and in findings against the plaintiff upon all the issues made in the cause. An examination of the record satisfies us that we would not be justified in interfering with the findings of the court below, nor do we find that there was any prejudicial error committed by the trial court in its rulings complained of respecting matters of evidence. The judgment is affirmed.
Plain English Summary
This action was brought by the plaintiff in error in the court below against the defendants in error to recover certain money claimed to be due by reason of his alleged employment by the defendants as their attorney in certain litigation.
Key Points
01This action was brought by the plaintiff in error in the court below against the defendants in error to recover certain money claimed to be due by reason of his alleged employment by the defendants as their attorney in certain litigation.
02The case was tried before the court without a jury by agreement of the parties, and resulted in findings to the effect that 1he plaintiff was never employed by the defendants in the litigation referred to, and in findings against the plaint
03An examination of the record satisfies us that we would not be justified in interfering with the findings of the court below, nor do we find that there was any prejudicial error committed by the trial court in its rulings complained of resp
04
Frequently Asked Questions
This action was brought by the plaintiff in error in the court below against the defendants in error to recover certain money claimed to be due by reason of his alleged employment by the defendants as their attorney in certain litigation.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Miner v. Rickey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 7, 1909.
Use the citation No. 8788345 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.