Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8646953
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Miller v. Astrue
No. 8646953 · Decided January 10, 2008
No. 8646953·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 10, 2008
Citation
No. 8646953
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Ruth B. Miller appeals the judgment of the district court denying Miller’s motion for summary judgment, granting the motion for summary judgment of the Commissioner of Social Security, and affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying Miller’s application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-434 . We review the district court’s judgment de novo. Moisa v. Barnhart, 367 F.3d 882, 885 (9th Cir.2004). The decision of the Commissioner must be upheld if it is “supported by substantial evidence and if the Commissioner applied the correct legal standards.” Howard ex rel. Wolff v. Barnhart, 341 F.3d 1006, 1011 (9th Cir.2003). After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the district court’s thorough opinion properly analyzed Miller’s claims, and we adopt that opinion as our disposition of this appeal. AFFIRMED This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Miller appeals the judgment of the district court denying Miller’s motion for summary judgment, granting the motion for summary judgment of the Commissioner of Social Security, and affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying Miller’s appl
Key Points
01Miller appeals the judgment of the district court denying Miller’s motion for summary judgment, granting the motion for summary judgment of the Commissioner of Social Security, and affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying Miller’s appl
02The decision of the Commissioner must be upheld if it is “supported by substantial evidence and if the Commissioner applied the correct legal standards.” Howard ex rel.
03After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the district court’s thorough opinion properly analyzed Miller’s claims, and we adopt that opinion as our disposition of this appeal.
04AFFIRMED This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Frequently Asked Questions
Miller appeals the judgment of the district court denying Miller’s motion for summary judgment, granting the motion for summary judgment of the Commissioner of Social Security, and affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying Miller’s appl
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Miller v. Astrue in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 10, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8646953 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.