Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627023
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Mijangos-Blanco v. Gonzales
No. 8627023 · Decided December 13, 2006
No. 8627023·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 13, 2006
Citation
No. 8627023
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Gladys Mijangos-Blanco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming an immigration judge’s order denying her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review. Mijangos-Blanco’s substantive due process claim fails because she cannot establish a protected interest in the discretionary relief of cancellation of removal. See Tovar-Landin v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1164, 1167 (9th Cir.2004) (“aliens have no fundamental right to discretionary relief from removal for purposes of due process”). Mijangos-Blanco’s remaining contentions lack merit. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Gladys Mijangos-Blanco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming an immigration judge’s order denying her application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Gladys Mijangos-Blanco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming an immigration judge’s order denying her application for cancellation of removal.
02Mijangos-Blanco’s substantive due process claim fails because she cannot establish a protected interest in the discretionary relief of cancellation of removal.
03Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1164, 1167 (9th Cir.2004) (“aliens have no fundamental right to discretionary relief from removal for purposes of due process”).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Gladys Mijangos-Blanco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming an immigration judge’s order denying her application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Mijangos-Blanco v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 13, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627023 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.