Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627340
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Mendoza v. Gonzales
No. 8627340 · Decided December 21, 2006
No. 8627340·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 21, 2006
Citation
No. 8627340
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because *677 the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Petitioner’s third motion to reconsider is barred by numerical limitations. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. The motion for stay of voluntary departure, filed after the departure period had expired, is denied. See Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir.2004). The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. All other pending motions are denied as moot. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *677 courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because *677 the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because *677 the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
03Petitioner’s third motion to reconsider is barred by numerical limitations.
04The motion for stay of voluntary departure, filed after the departure period had expired, is denied.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because *677 the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Mendoza v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 21, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627340 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.