Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623659
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Mendoza-Padilla v. Gonzales
No. 8623659 · Decided July 31, 2006
No. 8623659·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 31, 2006
Citation
No. 8623659
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Epitacio Mendoza-Padilla, his wife Gloria Morales Suastegui, and their son Jose Mendez Morales, 1 natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s *470 decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. The petitioners’ contention that the agency deprived them of due process by finding that they failed to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship does not state a colorable due process claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. . The clerk shall amend the docket to reflect the correct spelling of petitioners’ names, Gloria Morales Suastegui and Jose Mendez Morales.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Epitacio Mendoza-Padilla, his wife Gloria Morales Suastegui, and their son Jose Mendez Morales, 1 natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an i
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Epitacio Mendoza-Padilla, his wife Gloria Morales Suastegui, and their son Jose Mendez Morales, 1 natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an i
02The petitioners’ contention that the agency deprived them of due process by finding that they failed to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship does not state a colorable due process claim.
03Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Epitacio Mendoza-Padilla, his wife Gloria Morales Suastegui, and their son Jose Mendez Morales, 1 natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an i
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Mendoza-Padilla v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 31, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623659 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.