Question 1

What did the Ninth Circuit decide in Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker, United California Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. United California Bank?

Accepted Answer

Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker, United California Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. United California Bank is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.

Question 2

Is Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker, United California Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. United California Bank still good law?

Accepted Answer

FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker, United California Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. United California Bank in the current circuit citation data.

Question 3

When was Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker, United California Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. United California Bank decided?

Accepted Answer

This case was decided on November 26, 1962.

Question 4

How do I cite Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker, United California Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. United California Bank?

Accepted Answer

Use the citation No. 259339 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.

Feature	FlawFinder	Westlaw	LexisNexis
Monthly price	$19 – $99	$133 – $646	$153 – $399
Contract	None	1–3 year min	1–6 year min
Hidden fees	$0, always	Up to $469/search	$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citator	Included	KeyCite ($$$)	Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summary	Included	No	No
Cancel	One click	Termination fees	Account friction

Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Melba Schuster, Formerly Melba D. Baker, United California Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. United California Bank

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Full legal research for $19/month