Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8659393
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Medel v. Mukasey
No. 8659393 · Decided March 26, 2008
No. 8659393·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 26, 2008
Citation
No. 8659393
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Victor Graciano Medel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review *684 of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to reopen and reconsider the underlying denial of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal based on his failure to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United States citizen child. The evidence petitioner presented with his motion to reopen concerned the same hardship grounds as his underlying application for cancellation of removal. We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that petitioner failed to establish the requisite hardship. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 600-03 (9th Cir.2006). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** Victor Graciano Medel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review *684 of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to reopen and reconsider the underlying denial of petitioner’s app
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM *** Victor Graciano Medel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review *684 of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to reopen and reconsider the underlying denial of petitioner’s app
02The evidence petitioner presented with his motion to reopen concerned the same hardship grounds as his underlying application for cancellation of removal.
03We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that petitioner failed to establish the requisite hardship.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** Victor Graciano Medel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review *684 of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to reopen and reconsider the underlying denial of petitioner’s app
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Medel v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 26, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8659393 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.