Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689888
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
McManus v. Schriro
No. 8689888 · Decided September 25, 2008
No. 8689888·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 25, 2008
Citation
No. 8689888
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Charles McManus, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion, Pag talunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action because McManus failed to file an amended complaint after the district court directed him to do so, advised him that no further extensions would be granted, and warned him that noncompliance would result in dismissal. See id. at 642-43 (concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing petitioner’s action for failure to comply with order to file an amended petition). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Charles McManus, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Charles McManus, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
02§ 1983 action for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
03The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action because McManus failed to file an amended complaint after the district court directed him to do so, advised him that no further extensions would be granted, and warned
04at 642-43 (concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing petitioner’s action for failure to comply with order to file an amended petition).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Charles McManus, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for McManus v. Schriro in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 25, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8689888 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.