FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8845170
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

McColgan v. Lineker

No. 8845170 · Decided May 7, 1923
No. 8845170 · Ninth Circuit · 1923 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 7, 1923
Citation
No. 8845170
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
GILBERT, Circuit Judge. On January 22, on the trial of a suit of the appellees against the appellants herein, the latter interposed a defensive plea of res judicata. Argument was had on the plea on January 24, 1922. At the close of the argument certain comments upon the case were made by the trial judge, which were made the basis of an affidavit of personal bias and prejudice against the judge, and a motion that another judge be designated to try the case under the provisions of section 20 of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. § 987). But the affidavit and motion were not filed until March 16, 1922, 13 days after, the decision of the court upon the plea. On August 21, 1922, an order was made denying the motion for designation of another •judge. From that order the present appeal is taken, the appellants assigning error to the denial of their motion. No statutory provision is made for appeal from such an order. Nor is the order a final judgment from which appeal may be taken, within the grant of appellate .jurisdiction to the Circuit Courts of Appeals. In Crooker v. Knudsen, 232 Fed. 857 , 147 C. C. A. 52 , this court said : "The Circuit Courts of Appeals are given no right to review other than final judgments, except injunction orders, and no judgment is final which does not terminate the litigation between the parties on the merits of the case, or on some severable phase thereof.” In Ex parte Am. Steel Barrel Co., 230 U. S. 35, 45 , 33 Sup. Ct. 1007, 57 L. Ed. 1379 , Mr. Justice Lurton intimated that the order in *254 such a case might be excepted to and assigned as error, and taken advantage of when the case finally should come under the reviewing power of an appellate tribunal. The appeal is dismissed.
Plain English Summary
On January 22, on the trial of a suit of the appellees against the appellants herein, the latter interposed a defensive plea of res judicata.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
On January 22, on the trial of a suit of the appellees against the appellants herein, the latter interposed a defensive plea of res judicata.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for McColgan v. Lineker in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 7, 1923.
Use the citation No. 8845170 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →