FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8816746
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Matsumoto v. United States

No. 8816746 · Decided October 23, 1916
No. 8816746 · Ninth Circuit · 1916 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 23, 1916
Citation
No. 8816746
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM. There being no appearance in open court of counsel for ■either party, and it appearing to the court that the record herein has not been *1018 printed as required by rule 23 of the rules of practice of this court (231 Fed. v, 144 C. C. A. v), and it further appearing to the court that as the counsel for the appellant has failed to file with clerk of this court at least fifteen days before the case was called for argument, as required by rule 24 (231 Fed. v, 144 C. C. A. v), and that according to said rule appellant is in default, and that as prescribed by section 5 thereof the case may be dismissed, on consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the said appeal in this cause be and hereby is dismissed for the noncompliance by the appellant with the provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the rules of practice of this court. . .
Plain English Summary
There being no appearance in open court of counsel for ■either party, and it appearing to the court that the record herein has not been *1018 printed as required by rule 23 of the rules of practice of this court (231 Fed.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
There being no appearance in open court of counsel for ■either party, and it appearing to the court that the record herein has not been *1018 printed as required by rule 23 of the rules of practice of this court (231 Fed.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Matsumoto v. United States in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 23, 1916.
Use the citation No. 8816746 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →