Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8625375
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Martinez-Zaldivar v. Gonzales
No. 8625375 · Decided October 17, 2006
No. 8625375·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 17, 2006
Citation
No. 8625375
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is construed as a motion for summary disposition in part and a motion to dismiss in part. So construed, the motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United *761 States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review in part for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See Ekimian v. INS., 303 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir.2002). All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in PART and DISMISSED in PART. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is construed as a motion for summary disposition in part and a motion to dismiss in part.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is construed as a motion for summary disposition in part and a motion to dismiss in part.
02So construed, the motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.