Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8658200
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Martinez v. Mukasey
No. 8658200 · Decided March 26, 2008
No. 8658200·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 26, 2008
Citation
No. 8658200
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Zenon Flores Martinez and Dolores Flores, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying them motion to reconsider its previous order affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA acted within its discretion in denying the petitioners’ motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s prior order affirming the IJ’s decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(1); Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176 , 1180 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Zenon Flores Martinez and Dolores Flores, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying them motion to reconsider its previous order affirming an immigrat
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Zenon Flores Martinez and Dolores Flores, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying them motion to reconsider its previous order affirming an immigrat
02We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Oh v.
03Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.
04The BIA acted within its discretion in denying the petitioners’ motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s prior order affirming the IJ’s decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Zenon Flores Martinez and Dolores Flores, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying them motion to reconsider its previous order affirming an immigrat
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Martinez v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 26, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8658200 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.