Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627506
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Martinez v. Gonzales
No. 8627506 · Decided December 27, 2006
No. 8627506·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 27, 2006
Citation
No. 8627506
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Sergio Vera Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion, see Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Vera Martinez’s motion to reopen, because he did not demonstrate prima facie eligibility for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16 (c)(2) (applicant for CAT relief must prove “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal”); Mendez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 340 F.3d 865, 869-70 (9th Cir.2003) (“prima facie eligibility for the relief sought is a prerequisite for the granting of a motion to reopen”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Sergio Vera Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Sergio Vera Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings.
02INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.
03The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Vera Martinez’s motion to reopen, because he did not demonstrate prima facie eligibility for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).
04§ 1208.16 (c)(2) (applicant for CAT relief must prove “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal”); Mendez-Gutierrez v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Sergio Vera Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Martinez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 27, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627506 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.