Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10160746
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Marlin Pickens v. Virginia Mason Franciscan Health
No. 10160746 · Decided October 24, 2024
No. 10160746·Ninth Circuit · 2024·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 24, 2024
Citation
No. 10160746
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 24 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARLIN GIOVANNI PICKENS, No. 23-35163
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05019-RSM
v.
MEMORANDUM *
VIRGINIA MASON FRANCISCAN
HEALTH, AKA Saint Joseph Medical
Center, Health Care Services - Emergency
Department; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 16, 2024**
Before: SILVERMAN, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Marlin Giovanni Pickens appeals pro se from the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of its summary judgment in Pickens’s 42
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pickens’s request for oral
argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied.
U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various claims arising out of two emergency
department visits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an
abuse of discretion. Guenther v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 972 F.3d 1043, 1058 (9th
Cir. 2020) (motion for reconsideration); Hinton v. Pac. Enters., 5 F.3d 391, 395
(9th Cir. 1993) (compliance with local rules). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Pickens’s motion
for reconsideration because Pickens failed to establish a basis for such relief. See
W.D. Wash. R. 7(h)(1) (explaining that motions for reconsideration are disfavored
and will be denied absent a showing of manifest error or new facts or legal
authority that could not have been brought to the court’s attention earlier with
reasonable diligence).
We do not consider facts or documents not presented to the district court.
See United States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990).
AFFIRMED.
2 23-35163
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 24 2024 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 24 2024 MOLLY C.
02COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARLIN GIOVANNI PICKENS, No.
03MEMORANDUM * VIRGINIA MASON FRANCISCAN HEALTH, AKA Saint Joseph Medical Center, Health Care Services - Emergency Department; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
04Martinez, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 16, 2024** Before: SILVERMAN, R.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 24 2024 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Marlin Pickens v. Virginia Mason Franciscan Health in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 24, 2024.
Use the citation No. 10160746 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.