FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8690826
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Manullang v. Mukasey

No. 8690826 · Decided November 5, 2008
No. 8690826 · Ninth Circuit · 2008 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 5, 2008
Citation
No. 8690826
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Gunung Tony Mangatas Manullang, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, see Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition for review. The IJ denied Manullang’s asylum application as time-barred. Manullang does not challenge this finding in his opening brief. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of withholding of removal because the harassment and discrimination Manullang experienced on account of his Christian religion did not rise to the level of past persecution. See Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2003). Furthermore, even if the disfavored group analysis set forth in Sael v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 922 (9th Cir.2004) applies to Indonesian Christians seeking withholding of removal, Manullang has not demonstrated a clear probability of future persecution. See id. Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s denial of withholding of removal because Manullang’s similarly situated Christian mother remains in Indonesia without incident, see Hakeem, 273 F.3d at 816-17 , and he has not shown it would be unreasonable to internally relocate, see Gonzalez-Hemandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995 , 999 (9th Cir.2003). Lastly, Manullang did not establish that there is a pattern or practice of persecution of Christians in Indonesia. See Lolong v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d 1173, 1180-1181 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc). Manullang waived his CAT claim by failing to raise any arguments in his opening brief challenging the IJ’s denial of this claim. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Gunung Tony Mangatas Manullang, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for a
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Gunung Tony Mangatas Manullang, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for a
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Manullang v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 5, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8690826 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →