Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8637206
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Mahindru v. Bhatia
No. 8637206 · Decided May 18, 2007
No. 8637206·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 18, 2007
Citation
No. 8637206
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER * Andy Mahindru appeals the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s decision quieting title to real property in favor of appellees, Gulshan Bhatia and Chandani Sagar. The BAP held that credibility and factual determinations relating to the parties’ intent comprised the central issues in this case, and that the bankruptcy court’s conclusion that Mahindru intended to transfer complete equitable title to Bhatia was not clearly erroneous. The BAP further held that because the transfer of property extinguished Mahindru’s debt to Bhatia, the issue of an accounting of that debt was moot. We adopt the memorandum disposition of the BAP and affirm its judgment. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
ORDER * Andy Mahindru appeals the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s decision quieting title to real property in favor of appellees, Gulshan Bhatia and Chandani Sagar.
Key Points
01ORDER * Andy Mahindru appeals the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s decision quieting title to real property in favor of appellees, Gulshan Bhatia and Chandani Sagar.
02The BAP held that credibility and factual determinations relating to the parties’ intent comprised the central issues in this case, and that the bankruptcy court’s conclusion that Mahindru intended to transfer complete equitable title to Bh
03The BAP further held that because the transfer of property extinguished Mahindru’s debt to Bhatia, the issue of an accounting of that debt was moot.
04We adopt the memorandum disposition of the BAP and affirm its judgment.
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER * Andy Mahindru appeals the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s decision quieting title to real property in favor of appellees, Gulshan Bhatia and Chandani Sagar.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Mahindru v. Bhatia in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 18, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8637206 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.