Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8646930
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Madriaga v. Kane
No. 8646930 · Decided January 10, 2008
No. 8646930·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 10, 2008
Citation
No. 8646930
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** For the reasons given by the district court, the evidence wasn’t sufficient to support petitioner’s conviction. In holding otherwise, the California Court of Appeal unreasonably applied Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). See Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1274-75 (9th Cir.2005). AFFIRMED. *565 tied to recover consequential damages based on Colorado LLC’s alleged breach of contract, where Washington LLC did not inform Colorado LLC at time of contracting that third-party would terminate its relationship with Washington LLC or that its relationship was in jeopardy in the event of a breach. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** For the reasons given by the district court, the evidence wasn’t sufficient to support petitioner’s conviction.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** For the reasons given by the district court, the evidence wasn’t sufficient to support petitioner’s conviction.
02In holding otherwise, the California Court of Appeal unreasonably applied Jackson v.
03*565 tied to recover consequential damages based on Colorado LLC’s alleged breach of contract, where Washington LLC did not inform Colorado LLC at time of contracting that third-party would terminate its relationship with Washington LLC or
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** For the reasons given by the district court, the evidence wasn’t sufficient to support petitioner’s conviction.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Madriaga v. Kane in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 10, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8646930 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.