Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641517
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ma'at-Ra v. Bateman
No. 8641517 · Decided June 11, 2007
No. 8641517·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 11, 2007
Citation
No. 8641517
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Djehuty Ma’at-Ra appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging, inter alia, that defendants lacked probable cause for arresting him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . After de novo review, Haynie v. County of Los Angeles, 339 F.3d 1071, 1075 (9th Cir. 2003), we affirm. For the reasons set forth by the magistrate judge in his November 9, 2005 report, adopted in full by the district court in its November 30, 2005 order, we agree that Ma’at-Ra failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether any of his constitutional rights were violated when he was stopped, arrested, and detained by Glendale police. Ma’at-Ra’s remaining contentions lack merit. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Djehuty Ma’at-Ra appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Djehuty Ma’at-Ra appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
02§ 1983 action alleging, inter alia, that defendants lacked probable cause for arresting him.
03For the reasons set forth by the magistrate judge in his November 9, 2005 report, adopted in full by the district court in its November 30, 2005 order, we agree that Ma’at-Ra failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether any of his
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Djehuty Ma’at-Ra appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ma'at-Ra v. Bateman in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 11, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8641517 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.