Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8622033
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Lynch v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.
No. 8622033 · Decided June 16, 2006
No. 8622033·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 16, 2006
Citation
No. 8622033
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM * Appellant Michael Lynch appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for relief from judgment and a new trial under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(2), (3) and (6), as well as the district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. The parties are familiar with the facts and procedural history. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Rule 60(b)(3) motion when it found that the additional evidence proffered was insufficient to reopen the judgment. The law of the case governs the indirect damages claim and we see no reason to disturb it. See Lynch v. Trendwest Resorts Inc., 64 Fed.Appx. 44 (9th Cir .2003). The claims under Rules 60(b)(2) and (6) were waived because they were not argued in the opening brief. Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM * Appellant Michael Lynch appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for relief from judgment and a new trial under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(2), (3) and (6), as well as the district court’s denial of his moti
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM * Appellant Michael Lynch appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for relief from judgment and a new trial under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(2), (3) and (6), as well as the district court’s denial of his moti
02The parties are familiar with the facts and procedural history.
03The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Rule 60(b)(3) motion when it found that the additional evidence proffered was insufficient to reopen the judgment.
04The law of the case governs the indirect damages claim and we see no reason to disturb it.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM * Appellant Michael Lynch appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for relief from judgment and a new trial under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(2), (3) and (6), as well as the district court’s denial of his moti
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Lynch v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 16, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8622033 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.