Question 1

What did the Ninth Circuit decide in Lucille A. McKenzie Cecil McKenzie Jr. v. The City of Milpitas Frank Acosta, Individually and in His Capacity of the City of Milpitas?

Accepted Answer

Lucille A. McKenzie Cecil McKenzie Jr. v. The City of Milpitas Frank Acosta, Individually and in His Capacity of the City of Milpitas is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.

Question 2

Is Lucille A. McKenzie Cecil McKenzie Jr. v. The City of Milpitas Frank Acosta, Individually and in His Capacity of the City of Milpitas still good law?

Accepted Answer

FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Lucille A. McKenzie Cecil McKenzie Jr. v. The City of Milpitas Frank Acosta, Individually and in His Capacity of the City of Milpitas in the current circuit citation data.

Question 3

When was Lucille A. McKenzie Cecil McKenzie Jr. v. The City of Milpitas Frank Acosta, Individually and in His Capacity of the City of Milpitas decided?

Accepted Answer

This case was decided on February 7, 1992.

Question 4

How do I cite Lucille A. McKenzie Cecil McKenzie Jr. v. The City of Milpitas Frank Acosta, Individually and in His Capacity of the City of Milpitas?

Accepted Answer

Use the citation No. 576058 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.

Feature	FlawFinder	Westlaw	LexisNexis
Monthly price	$19 – $99	$133 – $646	$153 – $399
Contract	None	1–3 year min	1–6 year min
Hidden fees	$0, always	Up to $469/search	$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citator	Included	KeyCite ($$$)	Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summary	Included	No	No
Cancel	One click	Termination fees	Account friction

Lucille A. McKenzie Cecil McKenzie Jr. v. The City of Milpitas Frank Acosta, Individually and in His Capacity of the City of Milpitas

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Full legal research for $19/month