Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623627
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Lozano v. Gonzales
No. 8623627 · Decided July 31, 2006
No. 8623627·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 31, 2006
Citation
No. 8623627
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Alicia Hernandez Lozano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) order denying her application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to consider Hernandez Lozano’s contention that the IJ violated her due process rights in denying her request for a continuance and failing to provide an adequate explanation of hearing procedures, because she failed to raise these issues before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (noting that due process claims that are “procedural in nature” must be exhausted). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *440 courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Alicia Hernandez Lozano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) order denying her application for cancell
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Alicia Hernandez Lozano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) order denying her application for cancell
02We lack jurisdiction to consider Hernandez Lozano’s contention that the IJ violated her due process rights in denying her request for a continuance and failing to provide an adequate explanation of hearing procedures, because she failed to
03Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (noting that due process claims that are “procedural in nature” must be exhausted).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *440 courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Alicia Hernandez Lozano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) order denying her application for cancell
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Lozano v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 31, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623627 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.