Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8688192
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Lopez v. Mukasey
No. 8688192 · Decided August 1, 2008
No. 8688192·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 1, 2008
Citation
No. 8688192
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Marta Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of removal and her request for voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and we grant the petition for review. Lopez contends that the IJ violated due process by denying her a continuance, thereby violating her right to counsel and preventing her from presenting new evidence. Although Lopez raised these issues in her Notice of Appeal to the BIA, the BIA improperly failed to address them. See Montes-Lopez v. Gonzales, 486 F.3d 1163, 1165 (9th Cir.2007) (“[Tjhe BIA errs when it fails on appeal to consider and decide claims that the IJ proceedings suffered from procedural irregularity.”). We therefore remand for further proceedings. See id. In light of our disposition, we need not address Lopez’s remaining contentions. PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Marta Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Maria Marta Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of
02Lopez contends that the IJ violated due process by denying her a continuance, thereby violating her right to counsel and preventing her from presenting new evidence.
03Although Lopez raised these issues in her Notice of Appeal to the BIA, the BIA improperly failed to address them.
04Gonzales, 486 F.3d 1163, 1165 (9th Cir.2007) (“[Tjhe BIA errs when it fails on appeal to consider and decide claims that the IJ proceedings suffered from procedural irregularity.”).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Marta Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Lopez v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 1, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8688192 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.