Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627325
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Lopez v. Gonzales
No. 8627325 · Decided December 21, 2006
No. 8627325·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 21, 2006
Citation
No. 8627325
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ October 18, 2005 order denying petitioners’ second motion to reopen. We have reviewed the opening brief. To the extent petitioners challenge the BIA’s decisions dated August 15, 2005 and May 11, 2005, the petition for review is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Membreno v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1227, 1229 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). To the extent petitioners challenge the BIA’s October 18, 2005 denial of their second motion to reopen, respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2) (stating numerical limitations on motions to reopen). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part, DENIED in part. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ October 18, 2005 order denying petitioners’ second motion to reopen.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ October 18, 2005 order denying petitioners’ second motion to reopen.
02To the extent petitioners challenge the BIA’s decisions dated August 15, 2005 and May 11, 2005, the petition for review is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
03To the extent petitioners challenge the BIA’s October 18, 2005 denial of their second motion to reopen, respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as
04§ 1003.2 (c)(2) (stating numerical limitations on motions to reopen).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ October 18, 2005 order denying petitioners’ second motion to reopen.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Lopez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 21, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627325 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.