FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630523
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Longoria De Arredondo v. Gonzales

No. 8630523 · Decided April 23, 2007
No. 8630523 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 23, 2007
Citation
No. 8630523
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Reyna Cecilia Longoria de Arredondo and her husband, Eladio ArredondoAguirre, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review. Petitioners concede that their motion to reopen was untimely and number barred and contend that the BIA should have reopened their proceedings sua sponte to correct an alleged miscarriage of justice. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a). See Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2002) (noting that “the decision of the BIA whether to invoke its sua sponte authority is committed to its unfettered discretion”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Reyna Cecilia Longoria de Arredondo and her husband, Eladio ArredondoAguirre, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen deportation proceedings.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Reyna Cecilia Longoria de Arredondo and her husband, Eladio ArredondoAguirre, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen deportation proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Longoria De Arredondo v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 23, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630523 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →