Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8696481
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Linares-Gonzalez v. Lynch
No. 8696481 · Decided March 21, 2016
No. 8696481·Ninth Circuit · 2016·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 21, 2016
Citation
No. 8696481
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner Reyes Abigail Linares-Gon-zales (“Linares”) challenges the denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(1), and we deny the petition. Linares does not claim that he has suffered any past persecution, and poverty and general conditions of violence are insufficient to support a claim of asylum or withholding of removal. See, e.g., Lolong v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d 1173, 1179-80 (9th Cir.2007); Li v. INS, 92 F.3d 985, 987 (9th Cir.1996). Similarly, general conditions of violence and poverty are insufficient to show that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured if he returned to Guatemala. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.18 (a)(1). Accordingly, Linares has not' met his burden of showing his entitlement to asylum, withholding of removal, or relief under CAT. PETITION DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. . Linares’ petition for relief in connection with his request for cancellation of removal is addressed in a separate opinion issued concurrently with this memorandum disposition.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner Reyes Abigail Linares-Gon-zales (“Linares”) challenges the denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner Reyes Abigail Linares-Gon-zales (“Linares”) challenges the denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).
02Linares does not claim that he has suffered any past persecution, and poverty and general conditions of violence are insufficient to support a claim of asylum or withholding of removal.
03Similarly, general conditions of violence and poverty are insufficient to show that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured if he returned to Guatemala.
04Accordingly, Linares has not' met his burden of showing his entitlement to asylum, withholding of removal, or relief under CAT.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner Reyes Abigail Linares-Gon-zales (“Linares”) challenges the denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Linares-Gonzalez v. Lynch in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 21, 2016.
Use the citation No. 8696481 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.