Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642464
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Limon v. Gonzales
No. 8642464 · Decided August 22, 2007
No. 8642464·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 22, 2007
Citation
No. 8642464
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Carmen P. Limón and her son, Adolfo Limón Gonzalez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, see Ordonez v. INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen where petitioners’ evidence did not establish prima facie eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal. See id. at 785 (to establish a prima facie ease, the evidence must reveal a reasonable likelihood that the statutory requirements for relief have been satisfied); Maroufi v. INS, 772 F.2d 597, 599 (9th Cir.1985) (no prima facie case established where “affidavit and application for asylum consisted solely of eonclusory and speculative inferences drawn from generalized events”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Limón and her son, Adolfo Limón Gonzalez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Key Points
01Limón and her son, Adolfo Limón Gonzalez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
02We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, see Ordonez v.
03INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.
04The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen where petitioners’ evidence did not establish prima facie eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Limón and her son, Adolfo Limón Gonzalez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Limon v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 22, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642464 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.