Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8816492
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Lee Ling Hing v. United States
No. 8816492 · Decided October 3, 1916
No. 8816492·Ninth Circuit · 1916·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 3, 1916
Citation
No. 8816492
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM. This cause came on regularly to be hoard on the motion of counsel for the defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error therein for the noncompliance by the plaintiff in error with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the rules of practice of this court ( 208 Fed. ix , 124 C. C. A. ix ), and was duly submitted, and it appearing to the court that the plaintiff in error has failed to file a record thereof and to docket the case by or before the return day, and has failed to comply with the said rule, and that, pursuant to the said rule, the defendant in error has docketed the case and produced and filed a certificate of the clerk of (ho said district court, stating the case and certifying that a writ of error therein had been duly sued out, on consideration whereof, and pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the rules of practice of this court, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the said motion be and hereby is granted, and that the writ of error in this cause be and hereby is dismissed.
Plain English Summary
This cause came on regularly to be hoard on the motion of counsel for the defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error therein for the noncompliance by the plaintiff in error with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the rules o
Key Points
01This cause came on regularly to be hoard on the motion of counsel for the defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error therein for the noncompliance by the plaintiff in error with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the rules o
02ix ), and was duly submitted, and it appearing to the court that the plaintiff in error has failed to file a record thereof and to docket the case by or before the return day, and has failed to comply with the said rule, and that, pursuant
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
This cause came on regularly to be hoard on the motion of counsel for the defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error therein for the noncompliance by the plaintiff in error with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the rules o
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Lee Ling Hing v. United States in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 3, 1916.
Use the citation No. 8816492 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.