Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest Service
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8643340
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest Service
No. 8643340 · Decided September 11, 2007
No. 8643340·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 11, 2007
Citation
No. 8643340
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER * In light of the Government’s response that the Butte and Booth Fire Salvage Timber Sales contracts have been can-celled and that logging operations in the relevant areas have ceased permanently, it appears that the need for a preliminary injunction to enjoin implementation of the B & B Project has been rendered moot. We therefore vacate the injunction pending appeal. We also vacate the district court’s denial of Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and remand the case to district court to determine whether, in fact, the need for a preliminary injunction is moot. If the issue is not moot, the district court is to determine whether, under Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund v. Brong, 492 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir.2007), and Lands Council v. McNair, 494 F.3d 771 (9th Cir.2007), Plaintiffs are entitled to preliminary injunctive relief. *385 The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. VACATED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
ORDER * In light of the Government’s response that the Butte and Booth Fire Salvage Timber Sales contracts have been can-celled and that logging operations in the relevant areas have ceased permanently, it appears that the need for a prelim
Key Points
01ORDER * In light of the Government’s response that the Butte and Booth Fire Salvage Timber Sales contracts have been can-celled and that logging operations in the relevant areas have ceased permanently, it appears that the need for a prelim
02We also vacate the district court’s denial of Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and remand the case to district court to determine whether, in fact, the need for a preliminary injunction is moot.
03If the issue is not moot, the district court is to determine whether, under Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund v.
04McNair, 494 F.3d 771 (9th Cir.2007), Plaintiffs are entitled to preliminary injunctive relief.
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER * In light of the Government’s response that the Butte and Booth Fire Salvage Timber Sales contracts have been can-celled and that logging operations in the relevant areas have ceased permanently, it appears that the need for a prelim
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest Service in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 11, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8643340 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.