Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9022985
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Wheeler
No. 9022985 · Decided February 6, 2019
No. 9022985·Ninth Circuit · 2019·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 6, 2019
Citation
No. 9022985
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judges Berzon, Bybee and R. Nelson did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Plain English Summary
THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.
Key Points
01THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.
02The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
03Nelson did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
04
Frequently Asked Questions
THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Wheeler in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 6, 2019.
Use the citation No. 9022985 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.