Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626281
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Lanard Toys Ltd. v. Novelty, Inc.
No. 8626281 · Decided November 29, 2006
No. 8626281·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 29, 2006
Citation
No. 8626281
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ORDER * We dismiss this case as moot in light of the district court’s minute order of June 23, 2006, in which the court considered the very materials Appellant claims the court should have required in making its initial preliminary injunction ruling. See Dream Palace v. County of Maricopa, 384 F.3d 990, 1000 (9th Cir.2004) (“If an event occurs while a case is pending on appeal that makes it impossible for the court to grant any effectual relief ... to a prevailing party, the appeal is moot and must be dismissed.”) (quotation omitted). This dismissal is without prejudice to Appellant’s ability to seek further reconsideration of the preliminary injunction in district court. DISMISSED. Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal. A certified copy of this Order shall constitute the mandate of this court. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
ORDER * We dismiss this case as moot in light of the district court’s minute order of June 23, 2006, in which the court considered the very materials Appellant claims the court should have required in making its initial preliminary injuncti
Key Points
01ORDER * We dismiss this case as moot in light of the district court’s minute order of June 23, 2006, in which the court considered the very materials Appellant claims the court should have required in making its initial preliminary injuncti
02County of Maricopa, 384 F.3d 990, 1000 (9th Cir.2004) (“If an event occurs while a case is pending on appeal that makes it impossible for the court to grant any effectual relief ...
03to a prevailing party, the appeal is moot and must be dismissed.”) (quotation omitted).
04This dismissal is without prejudice to Appellant’s ability to seek further reconsideration of the preliminary injunction in district court.
Frequently Asked Questions
ORDER * We dismiss this case as moot in light of the district court’s minute order of June 23, 2006, in which the court considered the very materials Appellant claims the court should have required in making its initial preliminary injuncti
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Lanard Toys Ltd. v. Novelty, Inc. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 29, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626281 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.