Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8897587
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Lambert v. Brown
No. 8897587 · Decided November 12, 1970
No. 8897587·Ninth Circuit · 1970·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 12, 1970
Citation
No. 8897587
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
PER CURIAM: Stephen Michael Lambert appeals the dismissal by the district court of his petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking discharge from the United States Air Force as a conscientious objector. Since noting this appeal, it now appears that appellant has been given a General Discharge from the Air Force and is therefore no longer in the custody of appellees. We are informed that this discharge carries no continuing obligation by way of reserve duty or otherwise and that appellant’s position regarding veteran’s benefits is substantially the same as it would have been had he been granted an Honorable Discharge. Indeed, his position in this regard is markedly better than it would have been had he been granted the discharge he sought as a conscientious objector. See 38 U.S. C. § 3103. Since we know of no adverse collateral consequences of this discharge, cf. Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234 , 88 S.Ct. 1556 , 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968), it is hereby ordered that this appeal be dismissed as moot.
Plain English Summary
PER CURIAM: Stephen Michael Lambert appeals the dismissal by the district court of his petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking discharge from the United States Air Force as a conscientious objector.
Key Points
01PER CURIAM: Stephen Michael Lambert appeals the dismissal by the district court of his petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking discharge from the United States Air Force as a conscientious objector.
02Since noting this appeal, it now appears that appellant has been given a General Discharge from the Air Force and is therefore no longer in the custody of appellees.
03We are informed that this discharge carries no continuing obligation by way of reserve duty or otherwise and that appellant’s position regarding veteran’s benefits is substantially the same as it would have been had he been granted an Honor
04Indeed, his position in this regard is markedly better than it would have been had he been granted the discharge he sought as a conscientious objector.
Frequently Asked Questions
PER CURIAM: Stephen Michael Lambert appeals the dismissal by the district court of his petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking discharge from the United States Air Force as a conscientious objector.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Lambert v. Brown in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 12, 1970.
Use the citation No. 8897587 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.