FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10316855
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Kumar v. Garland

No. 10316855 · Decided January 17, 2025
No. 10316855 · Ninth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 17, 2025
Citation
No. 10316855
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SANDEEP KUMAR, No. 23-308 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-274-852 v. ORDER MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. Before: Evan J. Wallach,* Jacqueline H. Nguyen, and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges. Filed January 17, 2025 Order * The Honorable Evan J. Wallach, United States Senior Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. 2 KUMAR V. GARLAND SUMMARY** Immigration The panel issued an order withdrawing the opinion and dissent filed on August 2, 2024; replacing it with a memorandum disposition and dissent; and denying as moot a petition for panel rehearing. ORDER The opinion filed on August 2, 2024 (Dkt. No. 22) and published at 110 F.4th 1149 (2024), is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent to any court. A memorandum disposition resolving this matter will be filed concurrently with this order. The memorandum disposition reflects the following changes to the withdrawn opinion: On page 6, lines 9–10, delete: <Kumar was found credible, so his statements are taken as true. See Kaur, 986 F.3d at 1221. > On page 12, lines 10–11, delete: <we recognize that Kumar credibly testified that > ** This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader. KUMAR V. GARLAND 3 On page 12, lines 12–13, delete: <Based on Kumar’s testimony, > The petition for panel rehearing (Dkt. No. 27), filed on October 16, 2024, is denied as moot. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.
Plain English Summary
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SANDEEP KUMAR, No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SANDEEP KUMAR, No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Kumar v. Garland in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 17, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10316855 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →