Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8670137
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Kumar-Garg v. Mukasey
No. 8670137 · Decided May 2, 2008
No. 8670137·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 2, 2008
Citation
No. 8670137
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Surender Kumar-Garg, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of a motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion, Ordonez v. INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Kumar-Garg was not prima facie eligible for special rule cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2)(A)(ii) because he was unable to establish the requisite 3-year period of continuous physical presence in the United States. See Ordonez, 345 F.3d at 785 (“[A] motion to reopen will not be granted unless the respondent establishes a prima facie case of eligibility for the underlying relief sought.”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Surender Kumar-Garg, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Surender Kumar-Garg, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of
02INS, 345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.
03The BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Kumar-Garg was not prima facie eligible for special rule cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C.
04§ 1229b(b)(2)(A)(ii) because he was unable to establish the requisite 3-year period of continuous physical presence in the United States.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Surender Kumar-Garg, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Kumar-Garg v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 2, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8670137 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.