FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689263
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Kum Nurn Chan v. Mukasey

No. 8689263 · Decided September 19, 2008
No. 8689263 · Ninth Circuit · 2008 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 19, 2008
Citation
No. 8689263
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Kum Nurn Chan, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying Chan’s application for relief under former § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo claims of due process violations, Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review. Chan’s due process claims are unavailing because he has failed to demonstrate how the alleged violations affected the outcome of his proceedings. See Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring prejudice to prevail on a due process claim). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Kum Nurn Chan, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying Chan’s application for relief under former § 212(
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Kum Nurn Chan, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying Chan’s application for relief under former § 212(
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Kum Nurn Chan v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 19, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8689263 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →