Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10162836
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Kristin Hart v. City of Redwood City
No. 10162836 · Decided October 30, 2024
No. 10162836·Ninth Circuit · 2024·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 30, 2024
Citation
No. 10162836
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KRISTIN HART, individually and as No. 22-17008
co-successor-in-interest to Decedent
KYLE HART; E.H., individually and D.C. No. 4:21-cv-
as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent 02653-YGR
KYLE HART; W.H., individually and
as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent
KYLE HART, ORDER
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, a
municipal corporation; DANIEL
MULHOLLAND, individually and in
his capacity as Chief of Police for the
CITY OF REDWOOD CITY;
ROMAN GOMEZ, individually and in
his official capacity as a Police Officer
for the CITY OF REDWOOD CITY;
LEILA VELEZ, individually and in
her official capacity as a Police Officer
for the CITY OF REDWOOD CITY,
Defendants-Appellants
Filed October 30, 2024
2 HART V. CITY OF REDWOOD CITY
Before: Eric D. Miller, Bridget S. Bade, and Lawrence
VanDyke, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Judge Miller, Judge Bade, and Judge VanDyke have
voted to deny Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for
rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on
en banc rehearing. The majority of the active judges have
voted to deny rehearing the matter en banc. Fed. R. App.
P. 35(f).
The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Plain English Summary
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN HART, individually and as No.
Key Points
01FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN HART, individually and as No.
0222-17008 co-successor-in-interest to Decedent KYLE HART; E.H., individually and D.C.
034:21-cv- as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent 02653-YGR KYLE HART; W.H., individually and as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent KYLE HART, ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.
04CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, a municipal corporation; DANIEL MULHOLLAND, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF REDWOOD CITY; ROMAN GOMEZ, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the CITY OF R
Frequently Asked Questions
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN HART, individually and as No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Kristin Hart v. City of Redwood City in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 30, 2024.
Use the citation No. 10162836 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.