FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10162836
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Kristin Hart v. City of Redwood City

No. 10162836 · Decided October 30, 2024
No. 10162836 · Ninth Circuit · 2024 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 30, 2024
Citation
No. 10162836
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN HART, individually and as No. 22-17008 co-successor-in-interest to Decedent KYLE HART; E.H., individually and D.C. No. 4:21-cv- as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent 02653-YGR KYLE HART; W.H., individually and as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent KYLE HART, ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, a municipal corporation; DANIEL MULHOLLAND, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF REDWOOD CITY; ROMAN GOMEZ, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the CITY OF REDWOOD CITY; LEILA VELEZ, individually and in her official capacity as a Police Officer for the CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, Defendants-Appellants Filed October 30, 2024 2 HART V. CITY OF REDWOOD CITY Before: Eric D. Miller, Bridget S. Bade, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges. ORDER Judge Miller, Judge Bade, and Judge VanDyke have voted to deny Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing. The majority of the active judges have voted to deny rehearing the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Plain English Summary
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN HART, individually and as No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN HART, individually and as No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Kristin Hart v. City of Redwood City in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 30, 2024.
Use the citation No. 10162836 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →