Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8689063
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Krienke v. Commissioner
No. 8689063 · Decided September 9, 2008
No. 8689063·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
September 9, 2008
Citation
No. 8689063
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jackie Krienke appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s order denying her motion to *609 vacate the Tax Court’s decision dismissing her petition for failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482 (a)(1). We review for an abuse of discretion, Thomas v. Lewis, 945 F.2d 1119, 1123 (9th Cir.1991), and we affirm. The Tax Court did not abuse its discretion by denying Krienke’s motion to vacate because Krienke did not challenge the grounds for dismissal or show any other ground for relief from judgment. See id. at 1123-24 . Further, the record does not support Krienke’s contention that the Tax Court conducted a de novo trial. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jackie Krienke appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s order denying her motion to *609 vacate the Tax Court’s decision dismissing her petition for failure to prosecute.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jackie Krienke appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s order denying her motion to *609 vacate the Tax Court’s decision dismissing her petition for failure to prosecute.
02The Tax Court did not abuse its discretion by denying Krienke’s motion to vacate because Krienke did not challenge the grounds for dismissal or show any other ground for relief from judgment.
03Further, the record does not support Krienke’s contention that the Tax Court conducted a de novo trial.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jackie Krienke appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s order denying her motion to *609 vacate the Tax Court’s decision dismissing her petition for failure to prosecute.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Krienke v. Commissioner in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 9, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8689063 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.