Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641593
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Kinosyan v. Gonzales
No. 8641593 · Decided June 13, 2007
No. 8641593·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 13, 2007
Citation
No. 8641593
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Giorgiy A. Kinosyan, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s and BIA’s decisions because Kinosyan failed to demonstrate that he suffered past persecution or has a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of an enumerated ground. See Gormley v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.2004). Accordingly, Kinosyan is not eligible for asylum. Because Kinosyan failed to demonstrate eligibility for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See id. at 1180 . PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Kinosyan, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal.
Key Points
01Kinosyan, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal.
02Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s and BIA’s decisions because Kinosyan failed to demonstrate that he suffered past persecution or has a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of an enumerated ground.
03Because Kinosyan failed to demonstrate eligibility for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
Kinosyan, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Kinosyan v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 13, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8641593 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.