Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9412678
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Kevin Kennedy v. Shelly Williams
No. 9412678 · Decided July 11, 2023
No. 9412678·Ninth Circuit · 2023·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 11, 2023
Citation
No. 9412678
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 11 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KEVIN KENNEDY, No. 22-15465
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01358-RFB-DJA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SHELLY WILLIAMS; BARBARA
CEGAVSKE; WILLIAM GITTERE,
Warden; TIMOTHY FILSON; HOMAN;
DUGGAN; MINGO; CALVIN JOHNSON;
MUREDA,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 26, 2023**
Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Nevada state prisoner Kevin Kennedy appeals pro se from the district court’s
order denying his motions for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
action alleging various constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We review for an abuse of discretion. Jackson v. City &
County of San Francisco, 746 F.3d 953, 958 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Kennedy’s request
for preliminary injunctive relief related to his access-to-courts claim because
Kennedy failed to establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits of his claim.
See id. (plaintiff seeking preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to
succeed on the merits, he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of
preliminary relief, the balance of equities tips in his favor, and an injunction is in
the public interest); see also Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 349-53 (1996)
(elements of an access-to-courts claim and actual injury requirement); Hebbe v.
Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are
construed liberally, a plaintiff must present factual allegations sufficient to state a
plausible claim for relief).
All pending motions and requests are denied.
AFFIRMED.
2 22-15465
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 11 2023 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 11 2023 MOLLY C.
02MEMORANDUM* SHELLY WILLIAMS; BARBARA CEGAVSKE; WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden; TIMOTHY FILSON; HOMAN; DUGGAN; MINGO; CALVIN JOHNSON; MUREDA, Defendants-Appellees.
03Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 26, 2023** Before: CANBY, S.R.
04Nevada state prisoner Kevin Kennedy appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motions for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 11 2023 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Kevin Kennedy v. Shelly Williams in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 11, 2023.
Use the citation No. 9412678 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.